Skip to content
Ameen Abozaid
STF-013

Cross-team programs

  • 8 Lessons
  • 4 h practice (estimate)
On this page 9 topics

Overview

Topics

  • Dependencies
  • milestones
  • accountability
  • escalation

Learn first

4 h of practice (estimate)

Learning outcomes

  1. Structure a technical program across many teams into milestones with clear owners.
  2. Manage dependencies and the critical path across teams.
  3. Create accountability without being anyone's manager.
  4. Escalate early, with options, when a program is at risk.

Lessons

  1. 01Programs vs projects
  2. 02Milestones that show progress
  3. 03Dependencies and the critical path
  4. 04Accountability without authority
  5. 05Escalation done well
  6. 06Working with technical program managers
  7. 07Demo: a program review for the migration of 20 teams' pipelines
  8. 08Demo: escalating a blocked dependency with options

Lab and exercises

Lab

STF-013-LAB1 · Platform rollout program

Outcomes: 1–4 · Time: ~4 h

  1. Write the program charter for moving all teams to Platform 2.0 pipelines: outcome, scope, sponsor, success measures.
  2. Define milestones with owners and done-checks; build the dependency map and mark the critical path.
  3. Define the accountability routine (program review, status rules) and an escalation path.
  4. The assessor injects a slip (for example, a shared service delayed by six weeks); respond.
  5. Write the escalation note and the update to teams.

Acceptance: response protects the critical path and is communicated within one cycle.

Exercises (case-based; six exercises)

IDOutcomeTask
STF-013-EX011Turn "migrate everyone to the new pipelines" into five milestones with owners and checks.
STF-013-EX021Decide which of three initiatives need a program and which a project, and say why.
STF-013-EX032Given eight tasks with dependencies, draw the dependency map and name the critical path.
STF-013-EX043A team lead repeatedly misses commitments. Plan how you create accountability without being their manager.
STF-013-EX054A shared service slips by six weeks. Write the escalation note with impact, options, and recommendation.
STF-013-EX064Review a Gantt chart last updated two months ago and propose a replacement that stays accurate.
Show solutions
  • EX01 M1 pilot team in production, M2 five teams, M3 ten teams with support model proven, M4 all teams, M5 legacy retired; each with a named owner and a check such as "deploys through the new pipeline for two weeks".
  • EX02 Program: multi-team migration; project: a single team's service rewrite; judge by number of independent teams and cross-dependencies.
  • EX03 Map the chains; the longest chain by duration is critical; list slack on the others and who protects the critical chain.
  • EX04 Written commitments agreed with their manager, short regular review, early private conversation when a date is missed, and visible recognition when they deliver.
  • EX05 Impact (12 teams, M3 later by six weeks), options (lend engineers, descope, move M3), recommendation, decision needed by Friday, other party warned first.
  • EX06 Replace with a milestone board and dependency list reviewed each cycle, with RAG rules and a named owner who updates it.

Outcomes 2 and 3 are also covered by the lab slip response and accountability routine.

Workplace evidence: a cross-team program you led to completion.

Quiz

Outcomes: O1 milestones and owners · O2 dependencies and critical path · O3 accountability without authority · O4 escalation.

A self-check for you: nothing is graded, saved or sent anywhere. Choose an answer, then check it. You can try again as often as you like.

  1. 1A good milestone is:O1
  2. 2What most distinguishes a program from a project?O1
  3. 3Programs usually fail on:O1
  4. 4The critical path is:O2
  5. 5A one-week slip on a critical-path task:O2
  6. 6The dependency map should be reviewed:O2
  7. 7Commitments are strongest when agreed with:O3
  8. 8A weekly program review should mainly spend time on:O3
  9. 9A good escalation includes:O4
  10. 10When should you escalate a blocked critical-path dependency?O4

Practical part

Six case exercises STF-013-EX01 to EX06 plus the lab with the assessor-injected slip, assessed in a program review simulation. Pass: at least five of six exercises correct, quiz at least 8/10, and a response that protects the critical path and is communicated within one cycle.

Common mistakes

Gantt charts nobody updates; escalating late or as blame.

Assessment

Program review simulation.

Workplace evidence

A cross-team program you led to completion.

Career relevance

Solution roadmaps and migration strategy (ARC-036, ARC-037).

Type to search levels, phases, modules and lessons.