خيارات الحلول
في هذه الصفحة 9 موضوعات
نص الدروس والتمارين باللغة الإنجليزية، بينما تبقى واجهة الموقع وعناوين الدروس بالعربية.
نظرة عامة
الموضوعات
- تصاميم بديلة
- معايير التقييم
- مصفوفات القرار
تعلّم أولًا
4 ساعة تدريب (تقدير)
مخرجات التعلم
- Generate genuinely different solution options (e.g., commerce SaaS, packaged platform, custom build, hybrid).
- Define evaluation criteria and weights with stakeholders before scoring.
- Score options in a decision matrix and test the result's sensitivity to weights.
- Recommend an option and record why the others were rejected.
الدروس
المختبر والتمارين
Lab
ARC-033-LAB1 · Larkspur options analysis
Outcomes: 1–4 · Time: ~4 h
- Draft at least three genuinely different options (commerce SaaS, packaged platform, custom build, hybrid) plus the "extend the old web shop" baseline.
- Run a role-played stakeholder workshop and record gates, criteria, weights, and who endorsed them before scoring.
- Score each option in a decision matrix with an evidence note per score.
- Run sensitivity analysis: vary each weight and report whether the winner changes.
- Write the recommendation, and for each rejected option record its honest strengths and why it lost.
- Defend the analysis to an assessor who challenges your weights and scores.
Acceptance: rejected options documented with their honest strengths.
Exercises (case-based; six exercises)
| ID | Outcome | Task |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-033-EX01 | 1 | A project brief for Larkspur lists "Option A: buy Platform X; Option B: build everything from scratch with no budget for testing; Option C: do nothing and lose the market". Explain what is wrong and rewrite as three credible options. |
| ARC-033-EX02 | 1 | Write a half-page sketch for the hybrid option (SaaS storefront plus custom order orchestration): what Larkspur owns, rents, and what the first release contains. |
| ARC-033-EX03 | 2 | Larkspur's finance director wants "cheapest" and e-commerce wants "fastest". Draft gates, six weighted criteria, and a workshop plan that settles weights before scoring. |
| ARC-033-EX04 | 3 | Given a matrix with totals 3.9 (SaaS), 3.8 (hybrid), 3.2 (custom), explain what can and cannot be concluded, and design the sensitivity tests you would run. |
| ARC-033-EX05 | 3 | In EX04, raising "process fit" by 5 points makes hybrid win. Write the message to the sponsor presenting this result honestly. |
| ARC-033-EX06 | 4 | Write the recommendation section for the SaaS option, including three rejected options with their strengths and a re-evaluation trigger. |
أظهر الحلول
- EX01 Option B is built to fail (no testing budget) and option C is not a real option; replace with commerce SaaS, hybrid, and extending the existing shop as baseline, each with cost, time, and risk sketches.
- EX02 Owns: order orchestration, integration to ERP and CRM; rents: storefront, checkout, hosting; first release: web storefront with ERP stock and price sync; later: store pickup and returns orchestration.
- EX03 Gates: PCI scope reduction, data residency, ERP integration possible. Criteria and weights summing to 100 (for example time-to-market, total cost, process fit, integration effort, exit risk, team skills); workshop with both leaders, weights recorded and signed off before scoring.
- EX04 A 0.1 gap is within scoring noise; conclude that SaaS and hybrid are close and the decision depends on weights; test by moving each weight by 10 points, swapping top two weights, and varying scores by one point on uncertain criteria.
- EX05 State that the result depends on how much Larkspur values process fit; present both outcomes, name the disagreement, and ask the sponsor to rule on the weight, recorded as a decision.
- EX06 Recommend SaaS for speed and low run effort; note hybrid's strength of process fit, custom build's control, baseline's zero migration; re-evaluate if customization needs exceed the vendor's extension limits.
All four outcomes are also covered by the lab acceptance and the quiz.
Workplace evidence: an options analysis you led that produced a decision.
الاختبار
Outcomes: O1 generate real options · O2 criteria and weights · O3 decision matrix and sensitivity · O4 recommend and record rejections.
اختبار ذاتي لك: لا توجد درجات، ولا يُحفظ أو يُرسل أي شيء. اختر إجابة ثم تحقق منها، ويمكنك المحاولة مرة أخرى كما تشاء.
الجزء العملي
Options defense with assessor challenges on the Larkspur lab: the assessor challenges weights, scores, and one rejected option. Pass: quiz at least 8/10, at least five of six exercises correct, and a lab with at least three real options, pre-agreed weights, a sensitivity table, and documented rejected-option strengths.
أخطاء شائعة
Strawman options; criteria chosen after the favorite; no sensitivity check.
التقييم
Options defense with assessor challenges.
دليل من بيئة العمل
An options analysis you led that produced a decision.
الصلة بالمسار الوظيفي
Options analysis is the heart of solution architecture.